Cincinnati Climate Plan Summary
Overview
· Year 2006 Baseline – 8.5 Million tons
· 25.5 ton per capita (331, 283 pop.)
Target Plan
· 8% below 2006 by 2012
· 40% below 2006 by 2028
· 84% below 2006 by 2050
· 2% per year
Key Strategies - Voluntary Strategies rather than Regulation
· Actions that over their life cycle save more money than cost
· Improve air and water qualities
· Create local jobs
· Encourage regional economic competitiveness
· Building energy use accounts for 75% of Cincinnati GHG Emissions
· Majority of emission is due to dependence on coal for generation of electricity
· Created 6 Subcommittees; (transportation; energy; waste, etc.)
Transportation
· Hybrid buses
· Electric street car system between down town and uptown
· Increase bicycle use/“complete streets”
· Ride share
· Revamp city parking requirements to require less parking for certain developments
Energy
· Encourage home energy efficiencies
· Free CFL bulbs to low income homes
· “Green loan” program to assist in energy efficient renovations and construction
· Contractor training
· Cincinnati Conservation Corp. (For environmental service projects-see Chicago also)
· Awards/recognition program
Waste
· Cart based recycling (Lexington already has)
· “Buying green” program (promotion to increase citizen awareness)
· Increased commercial recycling
· Electronic recycling (Lexington already does)
· Food waste composting
· Develop “pay as you throw” garbage fees (see also Gainesville, Plano and Lansing)
· Creation of a recycle bank. Points earned are redeemed at local merchants
Land Use
· Develop “best construction practice” program
· Parks reforestation (Lex already has)
· Plant trees along I-75 corridor
· Expand community gardening
· Promote mixed use developments
· Redevelop brown fields
· Regional trail system
Advocacy
· Hold Climate Summit
· Marketing campaign to sell GHG specific proposals
· Public Education Program
Food
· Reduce meat consumption
· Eating locally program
· No-till agriculture
· Reduced packing
Implementation
· Permanent Climate Protection Steering Committee
· Staffing for committee by Office of Environmental Quality
· Regular routine budget funding
· Annual progress report was suggested
Other Notes
· Report is 42 pages. Each subcommittee detailed their work as an appendix
· Produced a graph of the recommendations which includes: GHG savings; costs per ton to implement; payback period.
· Produced an Implementation Responsibility/Assignment Chart
· Essentially came up with 70 + recommendations of which 33 assigned simply to further study and 37 to pursue implementation
· Overall seems more of a general “cookbook” of sustainability issues than a targeted GHG reduction strategy.
